Claim Reporting


calendar When: 2022-2023

calendar Team: 1 PO, 1 BA, 4 Engineers; (Architect & 3 Developers), 1 Designer, 2 researchers

calendar My Role: Sr. Product Designer

calendar Tools: Figma, Figjam, ADO


Background

FM - (formerly FM Global) a leading mutual insurance company specializing in property risk management and commercial property insurance. FM needed to modernize their software applications to improve efficiency, functionality, and alignment with current technological standards.

The Problem

Clients lacked an accessible way to report losses, making smaller claims < $150k more efficient to pay out than to formally report, rendering the system unnecessary for less significant damages.

The Goal

The goal was to provide clients with a quick, easy, and simple way to report losses and file claims, saving time for both clients and FM while improving claims efficiency.

*FNOL = First Notice of Loss


My Role: Sr. Product Designer

As a Senior Product Designer on this project, I was responsible for leading and executing the design process to deliver an intuitive and efficient solution for clients. My key contributions included

  • User Flows: Developing end-to-end screen flows to map the user journey and ensure a cohesive, logical experience.
  • Interaction Design: Designing seamless, intuitive interactions that guided users through the process of reporting a loss
  • Prototyping: Building interactive prototypes to validate design concepts, facilitate usability testing, and gather feedback from stakeholders and users.
  • UI Design: Creating visually appealing and user-centric interfaces that adhered to brand guidelines while enhancing usability.
  • Comprehensive Design Ownership: Overseeing every aspect of the design process, from ideation to high-fidelity designs, while collaborating closely with cross-functional teams to align with business goals and user needs.

Research

CONSTRAINTS: This feature prioritized delivering business value by optimizing workflows and enhancing client experience, with limited emphasis on extensive discovery and research during development. The streamlined approach focused on achieving quick, impactful results to support operational efficiency and decision-making.

Client Sessions

The research team interviewed users, clients, and brokers to identify pain points and needs, gaining insights into workflows and challenges. This informed the design process to enhance usability and streamline claims reporting. Their findings ensured the solution addressed user behaviors and expectations effectively.

Contextual Interviews

Data from 18 participants revealed trends and challenges, guiding solutions. Centralizing the data ensured efficient collaboration and a user-centric approach.



Method

  • Interviews: Conducted 18 client interviews via MS Teams.
  • Participants: All were Risk Managers or held related roles.
  • Relationships: Participants valued strong working relationships with their FMG Claims team.
  • Trust: Trust-based relationships helped resolve claims challenges effectively.
  • Reporting: Most reported claims directly to an Adjuster or Claims Manager.
  • Limitations: Adjusters or Claims Managers might be unavailable; phone access was deemed crucial, especially during major losses or natural catastrophes, for immediate assurance of claim response.
Airtable
Prevailing Practices

Most participants rely on custom built Excel spreadsheets to track property losses/claims. This method is generally perceived as effective.

  • FM Global does not currently provide a claims documentation system that fills client needs for documenting property losses/claims.
  • Significant property losses/claims are relatively rare, so the overall data set is not overwhelming.
  • Time element losses are typically not measured or documented unless a claim is filed.
  • Two participants currently use Riskonnect as their RMIS.
  • Riskonnect is viewed as an incomplete solution for property claims, better suited for liability claims.
  • Most participants would value a FMG system that provided more detailed loss/claim documentation.
Claim Summary and Relevant Loss Data

Participant requested data for Claims Tracking

* Loss Summary
  • Date of loss
  • Location
  • Claim number
  • Adjuster assigned
  • Cause of loss
  • Status (Open/Closed)
  • Primary data points for FNOL.
Financial Summary
  • Loss breakdown (with associated descriptions)
    • Physical Damage
    • Business Interruption
    • Loss Adjustment Expenses
  • Relevant deductibles
  • Payment details
    • Payment amount/date
    • Paying entities
  • Reserve amount (if there is a captive)
Notes/Est./Invoices
  • Record of adjuster in Communication
  • Adjuster’s perspective on claim status
  • Estimate/Invoice date
  • Cost
  • Contractor name
  • Approval status
Mixed Reviews

The Claims Tracker concept received mixed feedback. While Risk Managers valued detailed updates from their site-level representatives via email, some saw potential benefits for those handling claim intricacies. However, concerns were raised about the learning curve of adopting a new interface..

Pain Points
  • "When I want to get the status of a claim, I go to my guy on site. Where are you, what have you submitted, what do you have to do. If I get frustrated w/my person, then I’ll contact FM adjuster the claims reporting"
    ~ Duke University
  • "They exist but they are internal issues. It takes a while for invoices to get processed through our system"
    ~ Johnson & Johnson

Design & Simplicity figma

The design process for this aimed at creating a user-friendly simple, and easy experience. It began with mapping task flows in FigJam and collaborating with engineering to ensure technical feasibility and a smooth user journey. Low-fidelity prototypes were then created in Figma to visualize key interactions, such as selecting claim types, entering incident details, and uploading documents.

Task/User Flow

We used FigJam to map the user journey in more detail, addressing potential roadblocks. Collaboration with engineering ensured technical feasibility by considering constraints like database performance, allowing iterative adjustments to align the design with backend capabilities.

Wireframes

We created rough wireframes to map out the feature flow, providing a visual guide to the user journey. This process not only helped identify potential pitfalls early but also uncovered areas that might have been overlooked or missed, ensuring a more thorough and user-focused design approach.

* The research for the 'loss summary' data was key for identifying the data points required to process a claim effectively.

Changes & Challenges

After the initial wireframes, we reviewed and identified changes, revisions, and potential challenges to address.

  Error Handling

All fields in the form are required, with the exception of uploading documents or images. Error handling needed to be intuitive to minimize user frustration and provide clear guidance.

error handling
  Location Search

Location search was challenging; due to such a large query, we needed to give the user some kind of recourse (if it needed to be removed) if a selected location was deep into pagination.

search
  Description

The technical constraints for the 'description' field limited users to a specific set of special characters, so we ensured this requirement was clearly communicated upfront.

description

figma  Sub Flows

File Upload

The first sub-flow focused on document uploads, where users were able to attach files while getting clear feedback on acceptable file type, formats and sizes. We prioritized intuitive error handling upfront to make sure users could easily correct mistakes and smoothly return to the main flow without frustration.

Added Value & Outcomes

The file upload feature is a critical enhancement to the claims reporting process, built to prioritize speed and efficiency. It enables users to send all required documents and images in one action, significantly reducing their workload and simplifying the claims journey.

Key Advantages:
  • Time Savings:

    Users no longer need to upload files one by one, streamlining the process and allowing claims to be submitted and processed faster.

  • Streamlined Workflow:

    Consolidating multiple file submissions into one step makes the claims process more straightforward and user-friendly.

  • Reduced Workload:

    By automating and simplifying the upload process, this feature minimizes effort for users and claims teams, allowing everyone to focus on resolving claims efficiently.

  • Enhanced Impact:

    The feature directly improves the speed of claim processing and reduces delays, making a noticeable difference in user satisfaction and operational productivity.

Adding a Location

The second flow focused on adding a new location, initiated by selecting "Add Location" to open a modal form for entering details like name, address, and basic info. Upon submission, the location is saved, with confirmation or error messages, and users have the option to delete locations if necessary.

Why this mattered.

Including the ability to manually add a location to a claim was a vital enhancement for the product. Given the size and complexity of the database, which contains a vast number of addresses, it was easy for locations to be overlooked or mismanaged during the claims process. This feature ensures accuracy and efficiency in handling claims tied to specific locations.

Screens

Observations and Reflections

While I saw opportunities to further refine certain aspects of the FNOL experience—particularly in areas like navigation/stepper and the editing process—some decisions ultimately rested with the product owner. My role was to advocate for user-centered solutions, provide research-backed recommendations, and collaborate within the given constraints. Although I didn’t have the authority to make final calls, I focused on influencing through insights, presenting alternatives, and ensuring the best possible experience within the defined scope.

Measuring Success

After the launch, we received overwhelmingly positive feedback from users who were excited about the new FNOL system. The consensus was that the process was much easier and more intuitive. Key success indicators included:

  • High User Satisfaction:

    External users (policyholders) found the FNOL system much easier to use while adjusters saw a reduction in overall process time.

  • Increased Efficiency:

    Users completed claims faster with fewer errors, indicating an improvement in the overall claims submission process.

  • Strong Early Adoption:

    Early adoption was good, but we didn't do a lot of final testing, so further iterations could improve the experience even more

  • Positive Stakeholder Feedback:

    Internal teams praised the system’s alignment with business goals, and the company noted improvements in operational efficiency.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this project successfully delivered a streamlined and user-friendly FNOL (First Notice of Loss) system for reporting claims, improving the process for FM's clients. By combining user research, collaborative design iterations, and usability testing, we were able to create a solution that met both business objectives and user needs. This experience not only reinforced the importance of empathy in design but also underscored the value of collaborating with diverse teams to achieve a shared vision. The project continues to be a key example of how thoughtful, user-centered design can make a tangible impact in real-world applications.